Groww and Zerodha have made US-stock investing far more visible to Indian retail investors, but the more useful question for existing global investors is not simply which new app looks better. Should someone already using INDmoney or Interactive Brokers move to Groww or Zerodha? The answer depends on order size, funding costs, stock universe, custody structure and—crucially—whether your existing US holdings can be transferred without selling them first.
The four routes are not identical
Groww's current US-stock setup uses Alpaca Securities as its US brokerage partner through Groww IFSC. Zerodha uses ViewTrade through the India INX Global Access framework at GIFT City. INDmoney operates its US-stock service through its IFSCA-regulated GIFT City entity and works with DriveWealth and Alpaca Securities. Interactive Brokers is different: Indian residents can open an international account directly with IBKR and access overseas markets under the RBI's Liberalised Remittance Scheme.
That structural difference matters. Groww, Zerodha and INDmoney are trying to make international investing feel more like an Indian retail-broker experience. IBKR is a global brokerage platform with broader market access and more sophisticated trading infrastructure.
Groww vs Zerodha vs INDmoney vs IBKR: key differences
| Platform | US broker / route | Published US stock brokerage | Investment universe | Best suited for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groww | Alpaca Securities via Groww IFSC | 0.10% or $1 per executed order, whichever is higher | 10,000+ stocks and ETFs | Existing Groww users wanting simple app-based US investing |
| Zerodha | ViewTrade via India INX Global Access | 0.10%, min $0.01, max $10 per order | About 2,000 stocks + around 1,000 ETFs | Small-ticket investors and existing Kite users |
| INDmoney | DriveWealth / Alpaca via INDmoney Global IFSC | 0.25% per trade | 10,000+ stocks and ETFs | Users wanting strong INR-USD funding, tax/reporting and portfolio features |
| Interactive Brokers | Direct international brokerage account | Tiered $0.0005-$0.0035/share, min $0.35; fixed $0.005/share, min $1 | US plus 90+ global markets for Indian international accounts | Advanced/global investors and larger portfolios |
Brokerage is only one component of the real cost. Currency conversion, remittance costs, account structure, market-data needs and transfer flexibility can matter more.
Groww and Zerodha: the headline 0.1% fee hides a big difference
Groww charges 0.10% or $1 per executed order, whichever is higher. Zerodha charges 0.10% with a $0.01 minimum and $10 maximum per order.
That makes Zerodha much cheaper for small US-stock purchases.
| Order size | Groww brokerage | Zerodha brokerage |
|---|---|---|
| $50 | $1.00 | $0.05 |
| $100 | $1.00 | $0.10 |
| $500 | $1.00 | $0.50 |
| $1,000 | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| $10,000 | $10.00 | $10.00 |
A $50 Groww trade effectively pays 2% brokerage before FX and statutory costs. For investors buying small fractions every week or month, this minimum fee is significant.
For larger tickets, the gap narrows quickly.
How does INDmoney compare?
INDmoney currently charges 0.25% brokerage per US-stock trade, higher than the headline percentage charged by Groww and Zerodha. However, brokerage alone does not capture INDmoney's strongest advantage.
INDmoney has built its US-stock product around a GIFT City wallet with direct integrations to Indian banks. It currently advertises zero platform fee on fund transfers, zero withdrawal fee and no annual maintenance fee. The INR-to-USD conversion still includes a bank FX markup, which INDmoney says typically ranges around 0.5% to 1.2%, depending on the bank and transfer method.
It also supports more than 10,000 US stocks and ETFs, fractional investing from $1 and US holdings through regulated US brokers including DriveWealth and Alpaca.
So for an INDmoney user, switching only because Groww or Zerodha advertises a lower brokerage percentage may be shortsighted. The correct comparison is the total rupee cost required to put a certain number of dollars to work.
Interactive Brokers is a different category
IBKR is the hardest platform to compare directly with Groww or Zerodha because its target user and pricing model are different.
Indian residents using IBKR's international account can access overseas markets directly, including US stocks, ETFs and other global products. IBKR's India documentation says its overseas account provides access to more than 90 worldwide markets.
For US stocks, IBKR's tiered pricing starts around $0.0035 per share for ordinary monthly volumes and can fall further at very high volume, with a $0.35 minimum per order. Its fixed plan charges $0.005 per share with a $1 minimum.
For example, buying 10 shares of a $100 stock under tiered pricing would normally hit the $0.35 minimum rather than paying a percentage of the $1,000 trade value.
That can make IBKR extremely competitive for larger portfolios or active investors. It also offers sophisticated order types, global market access and institutional-style execution tools that Indian retail apps do not attempt to replicate.
The trade-off is complexity. Funding and reporting feel more like operating a direct foreign brokerage account than using an Indian retail app.
Should an INDmoney user move to Groww or Zerodha?
Not automatically.
A small-ticket investor making $50-$200 purchases could save materially on brokerage by using Zerodha instead of INDmoney's 0.25% rate or Groww's $1 minimum.
But INDmoney may still be preferable for someone who values its current funding experience, broad stock universe, portfolio tracking, tax reports and withdrawal workflow.
There is also a practical issue: moving existing holdings is not the same as opening a new account.
INDmoney supports position transfers in some circumstances through US-market transfer mechanisms such as ACATS and DTC. Its own documentation explains that US stock portfolios and even RSU/ESOP holdings can be moved between supported brokers.
So an existing INDmoney investor should first check whether the intended destination broker accepts an inbound transfer for that account structure. Otherwise the investor may have to keep old holdings where they are and use the new broker only for future purchases.
Should an IBKR user move to Groww or Zerodha?
For many serious IBKR users, probably not solely because Groww or Zerodha now offers US stocks.
IBKR provides much broader global-market access, sophisticated trading tools and competitive commission structures. It also supports both inbound and outbound securities-transfer mechanisms, including ACATS and Free-of-Payment transfers where applicable.
Groww or Zerodha may still make sense for an IBKR user who wants a simpler Indian app, easier portfolio visibility alongside Indian investments or a more familiar GIFT City funding experience.
But moving from IBKR to a platform with a smaller investment universe and fewer transfer capabilities can be a downgrade for an advanced investor.
Can you transfer existing US stocks to Zerodha?
This is one of the most important differences for anyone considering a switch.
Zerodha's current support documentation says secondary transfers and gifting of US stocks are not supported. US holdings purchased through Zerodha are held through its US brokerage partner ViewTrade rather than the investor's Indian demat account.
Therefore, an investor should not assume an existing INDmoney or IBKR portfolio can simply be ACATS-transferred into Zerodha.
This makes Zerodha attractive as a destination for new US-stock purchases, but potentially less convenient for someone whose main goal is consolidating an existing overseas portfolio.
Can existing holdings be transferred to Groww?
Groww's current US-stock model uses Alpaca, and Alpaca itself supports eligible ACATS portfolio transfers. Groww has also historically documented ACATS-based movement of US holdings.
However, Credivant could not verify from Groww's current 2026 public onboarding material that every new Groww IFSC account can accept inbound holdings from INDmoney, IBKR or another US broker.
Therefore, investors should confirm inbound transfer support with Groww before initiating a broker switch. Do not sell an existing US portfolio merely because the new Groww account has been activated.
Selling and repurchasing can create tax consequences, market-timing risk and additional FX/remittance costs.
Which platform is cheapest for different investors?
There is no single winner.
Small recurring investor: Zerodha's $0.01 minimum makes its brokerage structure particularly attractive for tiny orders.
Existing Groww user wanting convenience: Groww provides a familiar interface and broad 10,000+ stock/ETF universe, but the $1 brokerage minimum hurts small purchases.
Existing INDmoney user: switching is less obvious. INDmoney's 0.25% brokerage is higher, but its funding, broad universe, tax tools and transfer infrastructure may offset part of that disadvantage.
Advanced/global investor: IBKR remains difficult to beat on market access, execution tools and direct global-broker flexibility.
The real comparison should be:
Total investing cost = brokerage + FX spread + remittance charges + statutory charges + transfer costs + tax consequences
A difference of $0.50 in brokerage matters little if moving platforms creates a poor INR-USD conversion or forces an investor to sell and repurchase an existing portfolio.
What about Upstox, Angel One and Dhan?
They remain relevant alternatives.
Upstox uses Alpaca, Angel One uses DriveWealth, and Dhan uses ViewTrade in their current US-investing structures. Their offerings further prove that direct US investing is becoming a standard feature rather than a specialist product in India.
However, the most useful comparison for existing investors today is likely Groww vs Zerodha vs INDmoney vs IBKR, because those four represent very different routes: a new mass-market rollout, India's largest discount broker, an established US-investing specialist and a direct global broker.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Groww better than INDmoney for US stocks?
Groww has lower headline brokerage at 0.10%, but its $1 minimum per order makes very small trades relatively expensive. INDmoney charges 0.25% but currently offers a mature GIFT City funding and withdrawal setup, 10,000+ securities and additional tax/portfolio tools.
Is Zerodha cheaper than INDmoney for US stocks?
On brokerage alone, yes for most order sizes. Zerodha charges 0.10% with a $0.01 minimum, while INDmoney currently charges 0.25%. Total cost still depends on FX and funding.
Is Zerodha cheaper than Interactive Brokers?
It depends on the order. Zerodha uses percentage-based pricing while IBKR charges per-share commissions with minimums. IBKR can be cheaper for many larger or higher-priced-stock transactions, but the structures are not directly comparable.
Can I move my INDmoney US stocks to Zerodha?
Zerodha currently states that secondary transfers of US stocks are not supported, so investors should not assume an existing INDmoney portfolio can be transferred directly into Zerodha.
Can I transfer US stocks from IBKR to Groww?
IBKR supports outbound position transfers and Alpaca supports ACATS, but investors should confirm whether their specific Groww IFSC account currently accepts inbound securities transfers before starting the process.
Which is better for US stocks: INDmoney or IBKR?
INDmoney is simpler for Indian retail investors and provides a GIFT City wallet and integrated INR funding. IBKR provides far wider global access, advanced execution tools and highly competitive trading costs. The better choice depends on portfolio size and complexity.
Which US broker does INDmoney use?
INDmoney currently works with DriveWealth LLC and Alpaca Securities LLC for US stock investing.
Which US broker does Groww use?
Groww's current US-stock offering uses Alpaca Securities.
Which US broker does Zerodha use?
Zerodha's current US-stock offering uses ViewTrade through the India INX Global Access framework.
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. Brokerage, FX rates, transfer facilities and rollout availability can change. Investors should verify current transfer support before selling or moving an existing overseas portfolio.



